He taught philosophy in many famous universities of the India as well as and abroad like University of Chennai, Kolkata, Mysore, Benares, Oxford in London, etc. Some money minded teachers have also contaminated the atmosphere of teaching inRead more
Despite their relatively small numbers, the story of black Saint Dominguans in the United States is historically relevant. Godwin II The dissertation seeks to examine the careers of two of the most important naval figures of the GreatRead more
It can bring about great economic costs and prevent the development of international on-line trade. Print this essay Download Essay. In order to get more click rate and benefits, many adult websites advocate violent sexual abuse of women.Read more
The Capital and the Bay: Narratives of Washington and the Chesapeake Bay Region. Band Music from the Civil War Era. This award derives from an endowment established in memory of the Society 's longtime curator of newspapers andRead more
How to review a research paper
appreciative about the content of the reviews. I also want to know whether the authors conclusions are adequately supported by the results. We understand that you're busy, might have a conflict of interest, or may not be interested in the work described in a specific paper. The use of a discredited method. Also, the journal has invited you to review an article based on your expertise, but there will be many things you dont know.
Dissociative identity disorder research paper, Knowledge engineering research papers, Research papers on female infibulation,
I also selectively refer to others work or statistical tests to substantiate why I think something should be done differently. Robust Research This has enough data points to make sure the data are reliable. Sometimes a member of the program committee (e.g., your advisor) might ask you to help review a particular paper. Second, I ponder fast food industry argumentative essay how well the work that was conducted actually addresses the central question posed in the paper. I always ask myself what makes this paper relevant and what new advance or contribution the paper represents. So consider: Is the paper's premise interesting and important? I never use value judgments or value-laden adjectives. All work is incremental to some degree, as everything builds on past work. If you have any questions during the review process, don't hesitate to contact the editor who asked you to review the paper. List of References You will need to check referencing for accuracy, adequacy and balance. If there are things I struggle with, I will suggest that the authors revise parts of their paper to make it more solid or broadly accessible. When Recommending Rejection Where manuscripts have serious flaws you should not spend any time polishing the review you've drafted or give detailed advice on presentation.