Archived from the original on Retrieved 25 February 2018. Bandits found robbing coaches a profitable if risky venture as they may be shot or hanged if caught. Click on the corresponding links below see the most updated salaryRead more
Some people wonder, what is an anabolic steroid? Now for other and most people, steroids just hurt the sport, and are a bad influence on kidsthat want to play sports. Anabolic steroid, Androgen, Bodybuilding 2661 Words 7Read more
The test taker will be asked to read the passages, find mistakes or weaknesses in writing, and to provide corrections or improvements. It may or may not be biased, and it may or may not serve as aRead more
Students today live in a digital world are are accustomed to reading short pieces of information on their Read More Get Updates Receive news on new courses, special offerings and inspiring articles about teacher successes. I was happyRead more
How to review a research paper
appreciative about the content of the reviews. I also want to know whether the authors conclusions are adequately supported by the results. We understand that you're busy, might have a conflict of interest, or may not be interested in the work described in a specific paper. The use of a discredited method. Also, the journal has invited you to review an article based on your expertise, but there will be many things you dont know.
Dissociative identity disorder research paper, Knowledge engineering research papers, Research papers on female infibulation,
I also selectively refer to others work or statistical tests to substantiate why I think something should be done differently. Robust Research This has enough data points to make sure the data are reliable. Sometimes a member of the program committee (e.g., your advisor) might ask you to help review a particular paper. Second, I ponder fast food industry argumentative essay how well the work that was conducted actually addresses the central question posed in the paper. I always ask myself what makes this paper relevant and what new advance or contribution the paper represents. So consider: Is the paper's premise interesting and important? I never use value judgments or value-laden adjectives. All work is incremental to some degree, as everything builds on past work. If you have any questions during the review process, don't hesitate to contact the editor who asked you to review the paper. List of References You will need to check referencing for accuracy, adequacy and balance. If there are things I struggle with, I will suggest that the authors revise parts of their paper to make it more solid or broadly accessible. When Recommending Rejection Where manuscripts have serious flaws you should not spend any time polishing the review you've drafted or give detailed advice on presentation.